Old 02-02-2021, 03:19 PM   #1
Grewup on the CW
Senior Member
 
Grewup on the CW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 329
Default Portion of Chesapeake Westerns going to a Rails to Trails? Why not a scenic Railroad?

NS is supposedly open to selling part of the Chesapeake Western Line from Broadway to Mt Jackson, VA and the NS Line from MT Jackson to Front Royal. There is an active part of the line from Front Royal over to Strasburg so the part supposedly up for sale is probably Strasburg to Broadway. The portion from Strasburg to Mt Jackson has seen no rail service since NS split the rail traffic away from Southern's original path (Front Royal to Harrisonburg) during the early years of the NS merger. The portion from Mt Jackson to Harrisonburg's was then transferred to the Chesapeake Western time table/workload. Said all that to say this portion of track (Mt Jackson to Harrisonburg) has been kept up maintenance wise and only recently was the line cut at Broadway when traffic dwindled to two customers beyond Broadway. (Self inflicted NS wound from the drop in traffic as NS would not negotiate freight charges with those customers and those that already went to trucks) This part of the line can still handle traffic and the few bridges along the way are still in service. However the portion beyond Mt Jackson was not kept up and in some locations vegetation has completely reclaimed the line. The bridges along this portion of the line are in dire disrepair as the engineers running the trains over them shorty before the closing of the line were always worried of potential derails and accidents. So from my view point of the line (based on family members working these lines) and my own observations, I'm not sure how half of the proposed 50 miles of "Out of service" line can be even safe for public use if converted to a trail with out costing more than it would bring in returns. Personally, having traveled and visiting every part of the state of VA, there are plenty of places already available for bikers and and hikers to do their thing. Why another rail to trail? If the law makers want to fund a project with taxpayer money, Why not a scenic Railroad? If nothing more than on the 25 miles of track that can still handle rail traffic and would require less expense bring it to safe standards. Obviously, I am a railfan and the railroad put food on my table growing up so, I am slightly partial to railroads but no where in VA is there a scenic railroad. Why not invest in a scenic railroad? While this is not new "News" to those of us with our ear to the ground, below is the first article (that I am aware of) that has been made public about this rail to trail in the valley. I am bringing this subject to the forums to hear other viewpoints on this subject, rails to trails.

https://www.virginiabusiness.com/art...to-prosperity/

Last edited by Grewup on the CW; 02-02-2021 at 05:17 PM.
Grewup on the CW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 03:47 PM   #2
Grewup on the CW
Senior Member
 
Grewup on the CW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 329
Default Update: Rail trail gaining more support

Link is to a recent article from a local news paper;
https://www.dnronline.com/news/rocki...f462ffc39.html


While this is just one of many steps for those in favor of the rail trail, the local town council is on board for the conversion. The article supposedly quotes a statement from the meeting "The resolution stated that the railroad in its current state is a “blight’ on the community and a danger to those who trespass." I found this statement rather humorous and ironic on their part, had the railroad they find as "blight and dangerous" not laid tracks in that part of Virginia, the town of Broadway would not have came to fruition or thrived as a community without it. If they want to spend taxpayer money on converting a "blight" to a paved trail that supposedly limits the risk of liability, law suits and bring revenue to the communities, I think Virginia should have it very first tourist train, ride at your own risk, limited liability. With enough planning, folks living in the Northern VA over populated rat race could climb on board in Manassas and take ride thru the countryside and spend some of their hard earned cash supporting local shops in the passing community's during brief layovers. I dont see to many cyclists buying items of size and strapping them on their two wheeled ride only to peddled the added weight back to their original starting point. The possibility's are endless and my ideas may seem bias but If its not clear where is stand on this matter, I think the already existing 48 trails with 400+ miles is plenty for those who like to bike, hike or run.....

Last edited by Grewup on the CW; 03-08-2021 at 05:22 PM.
Grewup on the CW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2021, 04:50 PM   #3
ShortlinesUSA
Senior Member
 
ShortlinesUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 874
Default

This is an ages old dilemma. Trails always seem to be a "shiny object" dangled in front of communities through which rail lines pass. Sometimes they can be a boon and actually bring tourism dollars; often times they can be a waste of money, generating few visits outside of locals and sometimes even becoming a bit of a crime problem.

I could certainly see potential for the line as a scenic railroad, but it won't be boarding in Manassas. NS is not going to allow that to happen. But even beginning in Strasburg, it could be a destination for weekend visitors, especially if marketed in cooperation with some of the region's wineries.

The biggest obstacles I see right now is the general state of the tourism industry and the high cost of liability insurance for passenger rail. A grand idea such as this could possibly get off the ground during a red hot economy, but not at present.

But bottom line, I see where you are coming from. And having lived in Northern VA for 15 years and still working up there, I know very well there are enough high-wealth individuals in that area who live to LEAVE on the weekends. And a Napa Valley Wine Train level operation could likely succeed with the right financial backing to get it started. I would see two different audiences for such an attraction-- families looking for a train ride during daylight hours, and the "wine and cheese crowd" looking for a gourmet dinner in a unique setting during the evening hours.
__________________
Mike Derrick

Shortline and Regional RR forum moderator
ShortlinesUSA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2021, 12:48 PM   #4
Grewup on the CW
Senior Member
 
Grewup on the CW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 329
Default

Update:
Things have progressed to asking the public their opinion on the matter. Link below takes you to the survey which is open until June 25, 2021. Second link takes you to the local TV station's coverage. Whatever you opinion on the matter now is the time and easy way to voice it. I'm still promoting my tourist train idea.

https://live.metroquestsurvey.com/?u...&s=1&popup=WTD

https://www.whsv.com/2021/05/17/vdot...trail-project/
Grewup on the CW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2021, 07:05 PM   #5
ShortlinesUSA
Senior Member
 
ShortlinesUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 874
Default

From the sound of things at the first link, it doesn't seem like preserving rail service of any sort is on the table. Did I miss something in there?
__________________
Mike Derrick

Shortline and Regional RR forum moderator
ShortlinesUSA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 02:02 PM   #6
Grewup on the CW
Senior Member
 
Grewup on the CW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShortlinesUSA View Post
From the sound of things at the first link, it doesn't seem like preserving rail service of any sort is on the table. Did I miss something in there?
Well those involved that want the rail trail do not want that option talked about hence the lack of it in the article BUT there is two spots in the survey to voice your opinion and or suggestions to which I made mine against the trail and to preserve our rail heritage and bring in a tourist train. My sources working at the local RR have told me the line is not for sale nor is there any intensions for it to be placed in abandonment. Granted there is people higher up the food chain that may not relayed info otherwise to my source and money talks but every mention of this line being let go at this point is not an option. I put the link out there in hopes people will take the survey and voice their desire. I can only hope that I draw the attention of those who support my point of view on the matter and make the same suggestions in the comment box.
Grewup on the CW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 03:36 PM   #7
ShortlinesUSA
Senior Member
 
ShortlinesUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 874
Default

Good deal. Thank you for your efforts! I see much the same going on in Santa Cruz, CA where trail advocates are doing their absolute best to get an active rail line removed. They aren't even happy with a trail alongside the ROW. The rail must GO and a trail-only option is their only goal.
__________________
Mike Derrick

Shortline and Regional RR forum moderator
ShortlinesUSA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2021, 06:40 PM   #8
Grewup on the CW
Senior Member
 
Grewup on the CW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 329
Default

First link below is a video/meeting of the results from the survey link in my previous post.
Second link is a downloadable PDF of the results without all the members talking from the video.

Third link is from the website to which the the PDF is available.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqgklt7cYio

https://www.dcr.virginia.gov/recreat...esentation.pdf

https://www.dcr.virginia.gov/recreat...hen-rail-trail

This info is being presented to the General Assembly on Nov 1, 2021.

There were 9,283 responses and 5,456 typed comments. The typed comments are no where to be found and the original link is no longer available. If you happen to find a link to the typed comments. Please add it here as I would like to read those view points.

One fun or useful fact from the survey is that this portion of rail is within a 90 minute drive to over 4.5 million people. Yet the already established Shenandoah National park which has paved roads, campgrounds, lodging, gas stations and numerous trails only attracted 1.7 million people in 2020. Granted that was during Corona but majority of the national park amenity's is outdoors which was still available. I find it rather amusing that 4.5 million people may consider a 90 minute drive just to give their butts another ride on a bike that they have to peddle their legs off to do so or to go for leisurely walk.
And still, I am not quite sure how that would bring enough revenue to pay for the "safety" changes let alone bring in a return to help pay for it. I still think VA needs it's first tourist railroad and a fair study needs to be look into for its feasibility. Seems to me my option would offer a better return for the investment that us taxpayers will have to shell out either way.
Grewup on the CW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2021, 11:36 AM   #9
Callufrax
?
 
Callufrax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nth. Strathfield, Main Northern, NSW, Australia
Posts: 259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShortlinesUSA View Post
Good deal. Thank you for your efforts! I see much the same going on in Santa Cruz, CA where trail advocates are doing their absolute best to get an active rail line removed. They aren't even happy with a trail alongside the ROW. The rail must GO and a trail-only option is their only goal.
As I have a major interest in railways (I wouldn't be on RP.net otherwise!) and cycling (I'd love to see more rail trails), I like to take the view that there's enough room for everyone. Parts of the Great Allegheny Passage (particularly at the Cumberland end) shares the corridor with the railway.I'm planning on cycling the GAP and C & O in a couple of years time.
__________________
Wheely Big Bike Trip
Planning to cycle around the world, for FightMND and School in a Bag, from late 2025.
Callufrax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2023, 02:08 PM   #10
Grewup on the CW
Senior Member
 
Grewup on the CW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 329
Default Save the rails gains momentum.

Wanted to post an update.....People & Business in the community who share my vision have started to ban together and fight the removal of this historic line and for more than just preserving history. This has line, in the right hands, can produce more revenue than any bike trail will ever produce and deter the future crime a secluded trail could entice.
Help me in my cause and share this link with anyone that can help spread the word.
Thanks and blessings for a prosperous New Year.

https://www.shenandoahrailcorridor.org/

Sign the petition
https://www.shenandoahrailcorridor.o...nandoah-valley

Last edited by Grewup on the CW; 01-03-2023 at 02:38 PM.
Grewup on the CW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2023, 01:51 AM   #11
ShortlinesUSA
Senior Member
 
ShortlinesUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 874
Default

Thank you for posting the update. Maybe with the BB now running excursion trains out of Staunton with seemingly good patronage so far, local officials will even better get the point that this area can certainly be a destination for an excursion service.
__________________
Mike Derrick

Shortline and Regional RR forum moderator
ShortlinesUSA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2023, 02:11 PM   #12
Grewup on the CW
Senior Member
 
Grewup on the CW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 329
Default Save the Rails is gaining momentum!

Local TV station had segment on their news broadcast. Link below to the video.

https://www.whsv.com/2023/01/06/save...OaZbq7nSO936pE
Grewup on the CW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.